Cleveland Incinerator

Cleveland trash-plant consultant tries to save contract

A proposed waste-to-energy plant would provide some of the electricity supplied by Cleveland Public Power.

CLEVELAND — “City officials estimate that the plan could cost $180 million, which includes citywide curbside recycling. Proponents say the plant would operate cleanly and safely and reduce the city utility’s reliance on electricity purchased from coal-fired plants. They say it also would save millions of dollars each year on landfill fees and reduce the trail of pollution left by trucks commuting to dumps.

But environmental groups contend that the Japanese technology being considered by the city has not been tested on the volume of garbage that would pass through the Ridge Road site. They worry about the possibility of hazardous emissions, including mercury and lead, and want city officials to spend more time exploring alternatives like composting.

Tien holds U.S. licensing rights to the technology, which is owned by the Kinsei Sangyo Co.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told the Ohio EPA in a letter received Feb. 23 that the proposed plant would qualify as a tightly regulated major source of pollution, a designation the city had sought avoid. The federal agency also classified the plant as an incinerator, a word Cleveland officials had contended was inaccurate and refused to utter.”

— Thomas Ott, Cleveland Plain Dealer

Read the whole story: http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2012/03/cleveland_trash-plant_consulta.html

facebooktwittermail
Tags: ,