Energy / Freeze on Clean Energy

Debate over Ohio’s energy mandates is heavy on opinions, light on research


Ohio lawmakers’ months-long debate over state energy mandates has been marked by a reliance on historical data and studies from agenda-driven organizations on both sides, with no independent forecasts available about how the standards would impact ratepayers or the state economy. (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner, file)

COLUMBUS — “Late last month, Republican leaders of a legislative study committee recommended that a current two-year-long freeze on the standards should be extended indefinitely. The standards, passed in 2008, give utility companies in Ohio until 2026 to slash customers’ power usage by 22 percent and get 12.5 percent of their power from solar, wind, and other renewable sources.

If the mandates are left in place, the GOP study group’s report asserted, they will cost ratepayers almost $2 billion and increase the state’s unemployment rate by 10 percent.

These claims came from a single study done by a group of free-market professors at Utah State University and a non-profit think tank called Strata. Some of the authors have testified against energy mandates in several states and have received funding from the Koch Brothers, prominent conservative donors who oppose renewable energy incentives.

The study’s authors reached their conclusions after looking at all 31 states with energy mandates and finding that, overall, their economies suffered after they were put into effect.

Pro-renewable activists say that conclusion is flawed because more than a third of those states – including Ohio – passed their mandates between 2007-09, right before or during the global financial crisis. The Utah State study, critics say, unfairly places all the blame on the energy mandates instead of the unrelated nationwide recession.”

— Jeremy Pelzer, Cleveland Plain Dealer

link to full article

Tags: ,